Getting Smart Resources

To Fully Realize Horizon Three, We Need New Accountability Systems

This Getting Smart resource examines the relationship between ambitious, future-focused educational goals—referred to as “Horizon Three” innovation—and the accountability structures needed to support them. It argues that current standards and assessment systems are misaligned with the kinds of deeper learning, competency development, and whole-child outcomes that transformative education demands, and that meaningful innovation cannot scale without corresponding shifts in how schools measure and report success. The resource offers practitioners and school leaders a framework for thinking critically about how accountability can evolve from compliance-driven metrics toward systems that genuinely reflect the outcomes schools should be pursuing. For those leading or advocating for learning redesign, this piece matters because it names a structural barrier that often goes unaddressed—without new accountability systems, Horizon Three aspirations risk remaining theoretical rather than becoming embedded practice.

Measuring Learning Growth: Competencies and Standards

Measuring Learning Growth: Competencies and Standards, published by Getting Smart, is a resource examining how schools and systems can move beyond traditional grading and assessment models to track student progress through competency-based frameworks aligned to clear standards. It explores the relationship between competencies and standards, offering practitioners and school leaders practical context for understanding how to define, measure, and communicate meaningful learning outcomes. The resource addresses one of the core challenges in education transformation: shifting from seat-time and points-based accountability toward systems that accurately reflect what students actually know and can do. For leaders redesigning assessment and reporting structures, this resource provides conceptual grounding for making that shift in a way that maintains rigor and coherence across a school or district.

Additional Resources

Creating Standards-Based Rubrics and Proficiency Scales

Aurora Institute
The Aurora Institute’s resource on Creating Standards-Based Rubrics and Proficiency Scales provides practitioners and school leaders with practical guidance on designing assessment tools that clearly define levels of student mastery aligned to learning standards. It offers frameworks and examples for building rubrics and proficiency scales that move beyond traditional grading to communicate what students actually know and can do at each performance level. This matters for education transformation because well-constructed proficiency scales are foundational to competency-based education systems, enabling teachers to give meaningful feedback, helping students understand their own progress, and providing school leaders with clearer data for instructional decision-making. By grounding assessment in defined outcomes rather than seat time or point accumulation, this resource supports the shift toward more equitable, learner-centered systems where advancement is tied to demonstrated mastery.

How Prioritizing Standards Prioritizes What Students Already Know – and What They Need to Learn Next

KnowledgeWorks
This KnowledgeWorks resource examines how intentional standards prioritization can serve as a practical lever for more responsive, student-centered instruction. It guides practitioners through the process of identifying which standards carry the greatest conceptual weight, helping educators connect those standards to students’ existing knowledge while clarifying the most critical next steps in their learning progression. Rather than treating standards as a compliance checklist, the resource reframes them as diagnostic and planning tools that reveal where students are and where instruction needs to go. For school leaders pursuing learning innovation, this matters because it grounds transformation in instructional coherence — ensuring that shifts in practice are tied to meaningful academic outcomes rather than novelty alone.

Standards to Classroom: Transforming the Opportunity to Learn in California Schools

Learning Policy Institute
Published by the Learning Policy Institute, *Standards to Classroom: Transforming the Opportunity to Learn in California Schools* examines how California’s ambitious academic standards can be meaningfully implemented at the classroom level, with a focus on ensuring equitable access to high-quality learning experiences for all students. The resource analyzes the gap between policy intent and classroom reality, identifying the systemic conditions—including teacher preparation, curriculum quality, and school resources—that either enable or obstruct standards-based instruction. It offers practitioners and school leaders a grounded understanding of what genuine standards implementation requires beyond compliance, connecting policy levers to instructional practice. For those leading learning innovation, this resource is particularly valuable because it reframes standards not as bureaucratic mandates but as tools for expanding educational opportunity, making it relevant to equity-focused improvement efforts at both the school and district level.

WestEd Center for Standards, Assessment & Accountability

WestEd
The WestEd Center for Standards, Assessment & Accountability is a research and technical assistance hub that helps states, districts, and schools develop, implement, and evaluate rigorous academic standards and aligned assessment systems. It offers practitioners and school leaders access to policy analysis, improvement frameworks, and direct consulting support focused on closing the gap between what standards promise and what assessment and accountability structures actually measure and incentivize. The center draws on deep expertise in standards design and systemic reform to help education systems move beyond compliance-driven approaches toward coherent, equity-focused accountability. For leaders pursuing genuine learning transformation, this resource matters because it addresses one of the most persistent structural barriers to innovation: misaligned standards and accountability systems that reward narrow measures over meaningful student outcomes.