← Back to What Next: Impact

Developing a clear theory of change that articulates how and why your work leads to the outcomes you seek.

Getting Smart Resources

How We Lead the Change Is the Change: Horizon 3 Leadership

How We Lead the Change Is the Change: Horizon 3 Leadership” from Getting Smart is an article and framework resource examining how the approach leaders take to driving transformation is itself a core part of the transformation they seek to create. It explores Horizon 3 leadership — a model focused on long-term, systemic change — and argues that adaptive, relational, and values-aligned leadership behaviors are not just strategies but are the actual embodiment of the change process. The resource connects leadership disposition and practice directly to theory of change thinking, challenging school and system leaders to examine whether their methods of leading are coherent with the futures they claim to be building. For practitioners and school leaders engaged in innovation, this matters because it reframes leadership development not as a prerequisite to change but as a simultaneous and inseparable part of it, pushing educators to move beyond structural reform toward cultivating the mindsets and relational conditions that make deep transformation possible.

Empowering Small Schools for Transformative Change

Empowering Small Schools for Transformative Change” is a resource from Getting Smart that examines how small schools can develop and operationalize a theory of change to drive meaningful, lasting improvement. It offers practitioners and school leaders a framework for clarifying their vision, aligning their strategies, and measuring impact in ways that are realistic for schools with limited staff and resources. The resource addresses the unique leverage points that small schools possess — including tight-knit communities, relational trust, and organizational agility — and shows how these can be channeled into coherent, purposeful transformation efforts. For education leaders pursuing innovation, this matters because it moves beyond inspiration to provide actionable thinking about how change actually happens at the school level, grounding transformation in clear cause-and-effect logic rather than wishful planning.

Additional Resources

Theory of Action for Community School Transformation

Learning Policy Institute
The Learning Policy Institute’s “Theory of Action for Community School Transformation” is a framework resource that maps out the strategic logic connecting community school conditions, practices, and outcomes to guide coherent implementation and systemic change. It outlines how coordinated supports—spanning integrated health and social services, expanded learning time, family and community engagement, and collaborative leadership—work together to address the whole child and drive equitable student outcomes. The resource provides practitioners and school leaders with a clear causal pathway that links inputs and strategies to intended results, helping teams align decisions, measure progress, and communicate impact to stakeholders. For those driving education transformation, this theory of action matters because it moves community schooling beyond a loosely defined concept into an accountable, evidence-grounded model that can be adopted, adapted, and evaluated with rigor.

Unfulfilled Promise: The Forty-Year Shift from Print to Digital and Why It Failed to Transform Learning

EdWeek
Unfulfilled Promise is an EdWeek resource that examines four decades of educational technology adoption, analyzing why the sustained shift from print to digital tools has largely failed to produce the transformative learning outcomes that reformers predicted. It offers a critical historical account of how schools and systems invested heavily in digital infrastructure and devices while neglecting the pedagogical, cultural, and structural conditions necessary for meaningful change. The resource challenges practitioners and school leaders to interrogate the assumptions embedded in technology-driven reform, particularly the persistent belief that new tools automatically produce new learning. For those working on theory of change in education, this analysis is essential because it surfaces the gap between innovation rhetoric and classroom reality, pushing leaders to think more rigorously about what transformation actually requires beyond procurement and deployment.

← Back to What Next: Impact