Rick Hess makes a series of good arguments that the $500m ‘online skills laboratory’ isn’t a great investment. In the mixed provider post secondary space, quality content isn’t the top barrier.  It’s pricing that reflects the sunk costs of existing institutions.   A healthy market will make investment in content attractive; this seems to be doing the opposite.

Here’s a couple things the Department could do to spur innovation in the college prep and post secondary market:

  • invest in learning funds focused on adaptive content and new school formats (grants with profit recycle provisions for evergreen impact)
  • provide scholarships for online/blended providers targeting low income and minority populations
  • make grants for innovative platforms that blend open and proprietary content  with aligned student, teacher, and school supports (i3 should do this but won’t)
  • fund some R&D around the killer app: smart recommendation engines that queue a personalized learning playlist

The space badly needs public and private investment in innovation. USED should leverage private investment rather than dampening incentives.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here