It was good to read this editorial in today’s Boston Globe. A teacher writes in to correct a “misguided” notion that charter school students do not need full time qualified teachers. Here’s the letter in full, which I am printing, just because we need as much correcting the record as we can. She also says that teachers have to be very careful about how they refer to their work and their schools, since saying stupid things makes the kids feel worse, when they are trying so hard:
Charter schools may not legally “disinvite’’ students. Non-charter schools may not do so either. However, when non-charter schools, through various excuses, refuse to meet the needs of atypical students, they drive them to charter schools.If Yearwood felt called to teach at a non-charter school, that is great. However, she should not labor under the misguided notion that charter school students do not need dedicated teachers. It is an insult to charter school teachers, who willingly sacrifice union protections to work unbelievably long hours to fulfill the mission of their charter. They too are meeting the needs of students who could not get their needs met elsewhere. They too are answering a call, and a noble one. I am grateful for charter school teachers every single day, as they help my sons in countless ways to reach their potentials.By accepting the label of “dumping ground’’ for her school, Yearwood did her students a terrible disservice. Students rise to the level of our expectations for them. Yearwood’s attitude promotes a victimhood mentality, which will never help any student in the long run.
- Charter School Enrollment Climbs In Mass. (huffingtonpost.com)
- Fighting Charter Stigma: Denver School Opens Program For Disabled Students (huffingtonpost.com)
- John Merrow: Open Classrooms v. Charter Schools (huffingtonpost.com)
- City Room: New Home for Upper West Side Charter School (cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com)