With only two winners (thanks for holding the bar high Arne), there are two different paths to resubmission:

1. Support. FL & LA clearly had the most aggressive plans but got dinged for lack of support.  They need a little Barb O’Brien (Lt. Gov CO) style barnstorming to build support.  But will the need to increase incentives or lower the bar to gain support?  I hope not.  Their plans deserve support

2. Plan. Other states need to get more aggressive–fewer promises and more progress.  I see a few special sessions coming to lift charter caps, enact new teacher evaluation frameworks, and crank up school accountability plans.

The bottom half of the list isn’t likely to do enough of either to win but will make some progress none the less.

RttT is already the most successful grant program in history.  Read more in my response to my skeptical friends (you know who you are) on National Journal today

RttT already produced more policy reform than any other grant program in history. The high bar maintained today will increase phase 2 results. I think the skeptics were proven wrong today.

The combination of the president’s strong stand on teacher effectiveness backed up by $4b have already changed conventional wisdom on teacher evaluation–quite suddenly there is national consensus on data-driven evaluation.

Additionally, RttT reinforced adoption of Common Core, improved charter laws, improved data plans–all before a dime was spent.

Previous articleOnline Learning Saves Education
Next articleThe Book is an Artifact
Tom Vander Ark
Tom Vander Ark is author of Smart Parents, Smart Cities and Getting Smart. He is co-founder of Getting Smart and Learn Capital and serves on the boards of 4.0 Schools, eduInnovation, Digital Learning Institute, Imagination Foundation, Charter Board Partners and Bloomboard. Follow Tom on Twitter, @tvanderark.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here